Tech Banner

LHP Latest News Blog

Software Verification and Validation for Automotive Functional Safety

 

Redefine the Functional Safety Approach

Embedded software for automotive application has increased in complexity, there is a need to revisit and upgrade the conventional design approach to fulfilling the functional safety objectives. This not only affects the design, but there is also a need to improve the verification and validation process as more and more software based units, such as ECU, continuously control or interact with critical systems, such as braking and steering.  Process and development methodology play important role in addressing challenges such as complexity, quality and ultimately the productivity. The model-based design has been extensively used in the automotive software industry and both OEMs and suppliers have already started adopting and implanting Model-Based design for their embedded software development.

Key Questions that need to be answered:

  1. What verification and validation methods are recommended and best comply with ISO 26262? What needs to change in the existing verification and validation process?

  2. Are there tools available, off the shelf, that can be used for compliance with ISO 26262?

  3. How can the process be tailored and customized for different OEMs and suppliers?

Verification and validation need to answer the questions such as:

  1. Does the model implement its textual requirements?

  2. Does the object code to be deployed in the ECU implement the design embedded in the model?

 

LHP’s Approach to Software Validation and Verification

Exploring answers to such questions can be challenging. There are many tool vendors who claim to have the best verification and validation tools and can be used to comply with ISO 26262, however, the challenge is to select the correct tool and identify feasibility to customize such tools to meet individual customer requirements.

 

With LHPES’s approach to functional safety, our customers benefit from our combined years of experience in functional safety and designing, developing, verifying and validating embedded software. LHPES has successfully helped customers resolve their complex issues with tools selection and customization.

 

New Call-to-action

Press CTRL + D to bookmark this page.Press Command/Cmd + D to bookmark this page. / Print

Mastering Functional Safety at your Organization

 
  • Check-out these additional resources on Functional Safety compliance, training, and implementation! 

 

How ISO 26262 Opened the Doors - Use Case- Ipad
  
  • Use Case: ISO 26262 Compliance Opened the Doors to New Customers for Tier 1 Supplier
  •  
  • READ THE SUCCESS STORY

 
SemiConductor - Guide-booklet

 

  • Guide: How to Model ISO 26262 Compliance based on DO 254

    DOWNLOAD THE GUIDE

 

 

Most Recent

There are multitude of requirements management tools in the marketplace (e.g., IBM DNG, Siemens Polarion, JAMA, Helix). How does an organization make the important decision of which is best for its needs when the options are endless or when using Microsoft Word/Excel or Google Docs for requirements management can be considered? Is there even one tool that can meet all of the organization’s needs? This blog will describe why selecting a tool based on one specific departmental need, such as requirements management, might be impractical.

LHP Engineering Solutions is honored to be included in the 2020 Edition of the State of IoT Report, produced by the Indiana IoT Lab. We are grateful to be included with some of Indiana's brightest minds and organizations. LHP harnesses decades of technical experience and industry knowledge to help create products and establish processes that are safe, reliable, and innovative. Coupled with LHP’s unique knowledge in embedded controls, LHP can provide IoT and telematics expertise through integrating electronics, sensors, telematics, and equipment field usage applications into holistic IoT systems.

With the fast-paced growth and consumer interest of autonomous vehicles (AVs), it’s no surprise that companies are rushing to get ahead on the trend. Here are some of the most overlooked considerations companies need to put more emphasis on when it comes to implementing functional safety in the automotive industry.